Career guidance to classes 11, 12 students crucial, counseling essential: Delhi HC


Source link

NEW DELHIStressing upon the significance of career guidance to the scholars of class 11 and 12, the delhi excessive court docket has stated the authorities should guarantee there’s an applicable system of counseling in place in colleges. Justice Sanjeev Narula stated it’s important that college students are recommended about determination making processes and directed the Delhi authorities to look at the problem of offering profession steering to highschool college students in session with specialists.
The court docket handed the order on a petition by an “exemplary scholar” who didn’t safe admission in Delhi College, allegedly on account of his college not cautioning him that two of the topics opted by him in school 12 weren’t thought of as “mains”. topics by the varsity, which attracted a penalty of two.5% deduction of marks on the time of admission.
The court docket refused to grant the reliefs sought by the petitioner however stated if college students are made conscious of the admission insurance policies of various universities, it is going to assist them make an knowledgeable determination relating to their topic selections.
“It should be emphasised that profession steering to college students in Class XI and XII is essential. It’s certainly important that college students are recommended on this decision-making course of. Respondent authorities, who supervise schooling imparted to college students, should step-in to make sure that there’s an applicable system of counseling in colleges, profession steering programmes/ profession festivals, to help college students,” stated the court docket in its current order.
The court docket recorded that whereas the Delhi authorities counsel contended that such methods should be in place, “he’s unable to readily cite the identical”.
“Accordingly, the current petition is disposed of with a course to GNCTD (Delhi authorities)/ DoE (Division of Training) to look at this difficulty in session with specialists within the discipline and in case, any lacunae is required to be filled-in, they could accomplish that by issuing applicable instructions to colleges,” the court docket ordered.
The court docket rejected the petitioner’s prayer to cancel the CBSE affiliation of his college, saying it lacks basis and is untenable as “improper profession counseling to some college students can’t be a floor for de-affiliation/ de-accreditation, within the absence of any statutory provision that gives for such a penalty”.
It additionally noticed there was no foundation to carry that the petitioner’s alternative was not voluntary and that the varsity ought to have disapproved or opposed his choice as a result of it was prone to influence his admission prospects in DU.
“Petitioner’s rivalry is farfetched and reveals a really orthodox method in the direction of schooling centered round scoring marks. The Faculty, alternatively, would have a unique method of holistic growth of scholars and would encourage them to pick out topics based mostly on their aptitude. Marks can’t, due to this fact, be the only standards for choosing a topic,” the court docket stated.
It stated there was no purpose to direct DU to dilute its requirements for admission, as fixing the eligibility standards is a coverage determination which lies inside the unique area of the College.

Suraj Sewatkar
Suraj Sewatkar
I am HR by profession and a website developer and blogger by passion. I have 3 years of experience in my both professional as well passion field.My live mantra is "Live and Let Live"


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:



More like this