Delhi : Answer Sought From The Center On The Petition For Abortion Of A Minor Without Informing The Police – Delhi High Court

Date:

hear the news

The Delhi High Court has asked the Center and the Delhi government to explain their stand on the permission sought to abort a 16-year-old girl without informing the police. The teenager was in a close relationship with a man by mutual consent.

A bench headed by Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma has issued a petition to the Center and the Delhi government on the demand of the minor girl. The girl is 18 weeks pregnant in her stomach. The bench has asked the Additional Solicitor General to appear before the next hearing and help in the matter.

A bench of Chief Justice Sharma and Justice Subramanian Prasad said that there is no problem in getting an abortion as the consent of the victim does not matter in a sexual offense with a minor and it is mandatory under Section 19 of the Protection of Child Sexual Offenses Act. It is necessary to inform the police about this. The bench said that if the girl child is a minor then it is an offence. The matter should be reported to the police. Even if they are not interested in it but it is a crime against the state. The bench will hear the matter on September 20.

The petitioner’s counsel Amit Mishra claimed that the hospitals refused to perform the abortion without informing the police. He said the minor was in a mutually consensual relationship and now the family does not want to report the matter “out of shame and humiliation”. The petitioner submitted that reporting to the police would put a social stigma on her and if the abortion was not allowed, the minor would not be able to bring up the child due to her young age.

The petition states that the petitioner’s daughter has a fundamental right to privacy, personal autonomy, dignity, reproductive choice which is inseparable from the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution. It states that if a minor is not permitted to abort her pregnancy, she shall undergo abortion at a paralyzed doctor or any unregistered or illegal (medical) center and may cause certain complications or serious risk to her health.

Freedom for schools to maintain standards set for themselves
The High Court made it clear that the schools, including those under the state government, have the liberty to maintain the standards set for themselves. Their prescribing of eligibility criteria for admission to various classes cannot be said to be arbitrary or illegal. The institution running the school also has the right to do so. Justice Chandradhari Singh made this observation while hearing a petition filed by the father of a minor girl challenging the validity of a circular issued by the Delhi government on July 27.

In the petition, it was challenged to make minimum 71 percent marks mandatory for admission in Science stream in class 11 of Rajkiya Pratibha Vidyalaya. The petitioner has got 69 percent marks in Science stream. The court said that the petitioner could not fulfill the eligibility criteria, hence challenging the eligibility criteria. All schools have the discretion to fix minimum marks for admission, challenging the same is baseless. The court also noted that the government had on February 7 issued a circular regarding reservation for SC, ST and OBC categories for enrollment in schools of specific excellence. It did not issue this circular to all schools universally.

Laptop and equipment seized from Zubair deposited in FSL
A laptop and other equipment confiscated from Alt News co-founder Mohammad Zubair have been submitted to the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) to capture data in connection with his alleged objectionable tweets against a Hindu deity in 2018. it can be explained.

Delhi Police gave this information to the High Court on Friday. In response to a petition filed before Justice Purushendra Kumar Kaurav, the police against the exercise of arrest, search and seizure of Zubair in a case related to the alleged objectionable tweet. This has been said in the affidavit. The court fixed October 31 for its next hearing, giving time to Zubair’s counsel to file a reply in the matter.

Expansion

The Delhi High Court has asked the Center and the Delhi government to explain their stand on the permission sought to abort a 16-year-old girl without informing the police. The teenager was in a close relationship with a man by mutual consent.

A bench headed by Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma has issued a petition to the Center and the Delhi government on the demand of the minor girl. The girl is 18 weeks pregnant in her stomach. The bench has asked the Additional Solicitor General to appear before the next hearing and help in the matter.

A bench of Chief Justice Sharma and Justice Subramanian Prasad said that there is no problem in getting an abortion as the consent of the victim does not matter in a sexual offense with a minor and it is mandatory under Section 19 of the Protection of Child Sexual Offenses Act. It is necessary to inform the police about this. The bench said that if the girl child is a minor then it is an offence. The matter should be reported to the police. Even if they are not interested in it but it is a crime against the state. The bench will hear the matter on September 20.

The petitioner’s counsel Amit Mishra claimed that the hospitals refused to perform the abortion without informing the police. He said the minor was in a mutually consensual relationship and now the family does not want to report the matter “out of shame and humiliation”. The petitioner submitted that reporting to the police would put a social stigma on her and if the abortion was not allowed, the minor would not be able to bring up the child due to her young age.

The petition states that the petitioner’s daughter has a fundamental right to privacy, personal autonomy, dignity, reproductive choice which is inseparable from the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution. It states that if a minor is not permitted to abort her pregnancy, she shall undergo abortion at a paralyzed doctor or any unregistered or illegal (medical) center and may cause certain complications or serious risk to her health.

Freedom for schools to maintain standards set for themselves

The High Court made it clear that the schools, including those under the state government, have the liberty to maintain the standards set for themselves. Their prescribing of eligibility criteria for admission to various classes cannot be said to be arbitrary or illegal. The institution running the school also has the right to do so. Justice Chandradhari Singh made this observation while hearing a petition filed by the father of a minor girl challenging the validity of a circular issued by the Delhi government on July 27.

In the petition, it was challenged to make minimum 71 percent marks mandatory for admission in Science stream in class 11 of Rajkiya Pratibha Vidyalaya. The petitioner has got 69 percent marks in Science stream. The court said that the petitioner could not fulfill the eligibility criteria, hence challenging the eligibility criteria. All schools have the discretion to fix minimum marks for admission, challenging the same is baseless. The court also noted that the government had on February 7 issued a circular regarding reservation for SC, ST and OBC categories for enrollment in schools of specific excellence. It did not issue this circular to all schools universally.

Laptop and equipment seized from Zubair deposited in FSL

A laptop and other equipment confiscated from Alt News co-founder Mohammad Zubair have been submitted to the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) to capture data in connection with his alleged objectionable tweets against a Hindu deity in 2018. it can be explained.

Delhi Police gave this information to the High Court on Friday. In response to a petition filed before Justice Purushendra Kumar Kaurav, the police against the exercise of arrest, search and seizure of Zubair in a case related to the alleged objectionable tweet. This has been said in the affidavit. The court fixed October 31 for its next hearing, giving time to Zubair’s counsel to file a reply in the matter.

Source link

About Post Author

Suraj Sewatkar
Suraj Sewatkarhttp://sktodaysnews.com
Hi !!! This is Suraj Sewatkar, a blogger by hobby and HR by profession. I like to learn new things and go to new places. I am a website developer and have developed a number of websites and blogs on Blogger as well as WordPress as well with 3 years of experience in the HR field

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

An exceptional media briefing on “Corona” tomorrow, Monday

The National Emergency Crisis and Disaster Management Authority announced...

The Best Board Games for Large Groups – Review Geek

Another holiday family get-together is winding down. Tables...