The stringent law against money laundering, which received a thumbs up from the Supreme Court recently, will be up for review again, with the top court agreeing to hear a petition that has challenged the judgment. The hearing will be held tomorrow.
In a judgment last month, the court had upheld the Enforcement Directorate’s extensive powers to search, seize and arrest, which were challenged in multiple petitions. The petitioners had argued that these powers were mostly misused, in cases where opposition leaders are involved.
The 250-odd petition had also argued that handing an agency unchecked powers of arrest where the accused may not be informed about reason or evidence, is unconstitutional. They also contended that the use of statements in court recorded during questioning should not be allowed, since such statements can also be extracted under duress.
The court held that the Enforcement Directorate is “not required to share the ECIR (Enforcement Case Information Report) copy” with the accused. This document, the court said, cannot be equated with an FIR (First Information Report).
“It is enough if Enforcement Directorate, at time of arrest, discloses grounds of such arrest,” the judges had said.
Declaring that the ED’s power of arrest is not arbitrary, the court said money laundering not only affects the nation’s social and economic fabric but also tends to promote other heinous crimes including terrorism.
The top court’s judgment was challenged by Congress’s Karti Chidambaram, the son of former Union minister P Chidambaram, who has sought a stay on it. The ED is investigating an alleged money laundering case in which he has been named.
A favorite verdict was likely to affect a huge number of opposition leaders — including Congress’s Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi, former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Farooq Abdullah and Trinamool Congress’s Partha Chatterjee — who are under the scanner of the Central investigating agency.
With many opposition leaders under the ED scanner over the anti-money laundering laws, the opposition has repeatedly accused the Center of misusing Central agencies to fulfill a political vendetta.